Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,592
Lee v. Parton et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee
Defendant:
Chad Parton, Tammy Warren and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Makupson v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2024mc00024
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Glenn Jacobs, Ricky Oates, Duane Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buhl v. Artz et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
James Edward Buhl, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Artz, FNU Matthews, FNU Mackensey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Coffee County Mayor et al
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Cody Alan King
Respondent:
Coffee County Mayor, Sheriff Chad Partin, Frank Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lineberry et al
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Amber Lineberry and Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00714
Petitioner:
Calvin Starks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robertson v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Core Civic, Damon Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elnour v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02394
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elnour
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthews v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Frederick Matthews
Defendant:
Jim Casey, Stacy Oaks, William Blackerby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Terrance Arnold, II
Defendant:
Jeremy Cox and Lexington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
