District of Wyoming Contract Cases

Negotiable Instrument Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bank of Jackson Hole v. Cook GS Investment Partners LP
as 1:2014cv00234
Defendant: Cook GS Investment Partners LP
Plaintiff: Bank of Jackson Hole
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
SIMBA FNC LLC v. Andrews III
as 2:2014cv00123
Defendant: T Coleman Andrews III
Plaintiff: SIMBA FNC LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Wyoming Glass Inc v. Trainor Glass Company Inc
as 1:2011cv00329
Plaintiff: Wyoming Glass Inc
Defendant: Trainor Glass Company Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Default
Richard et al v. Hansen
as 2:2011cv00318
Plaintiff: Cyril K Richard , Delona Richard , Tom Prince
Defendant: Kirkland R Hansen
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Default
CHS Inc v. Hinze et al
as 2:2011cv00301
Defendant: Scott A Hinze , Bryan A Hinze , Dale A Hinze and others
Plaintiff: CHS Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Scobby Irrevocable Trust et al
as 2:2011cv00081
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant: Scobby Irrevocable Trust , Michael F Scobby
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Default
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2011cv00038
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant: Hazen R Hatfield, Ponderosa Paint of Jackson
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Wells Fargo Bank NA v Mateosky
as 2:2011cv00037
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant: Kasey Mateosky
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Harrison
as 2:2011cv00029
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant: Brandon J Harrison
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Default
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. CDK Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00028
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant: CDK Inc , Carl David King
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Default
1 2 3 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.