Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1 - 10
Camo Sanchez v. Warden, Glades County Detention Center et al. (Glades)
as 2:2026cv02696
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
In Re: Coupel et al
as 2:2026cv00765
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Caramat Trading Inc v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv04606
Plaintiff:
CARAMAT TRADING INC
Defendant:
United States, Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Wilson & Lumi Trading Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv04610
Plaintiff:
WILSON & LUMI TRADING INC.
Defendant:
United States, Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Lascana Fashion, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv04599
Plaintiff:
Lascana Fashion, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Ringel v. Schiebner
as 2:2026cv13959
Petitioner:
Gregory Allen Ringel
Defendant:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Habash Trading, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv04579
Plaintiff:
Habash Trading, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Custom and Border Protection, Rodney Scott and The United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
