District Court Cases in Louisiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Taylor v. USP Pollock Staff
as 1:2026cv04633
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ElementUS Minerals LLC v. Atalco Gramercy LLC
as 2:2026cv02518
Defendant:
Atalco Gramercy LLC
Plaintiff:
ElementUS Minerals LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 (b) Prelim & Perm Inj Relief & Other Equitable Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04604
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vasquez et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2026cv01228
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Misty Vasquez and Roberto A. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
May v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2026cv04615
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Regina May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Loop Linen Services, Inc. v. Biloxi SF, LLC, et al
as 2:2026cv02520
Defendant:
Lloyd Sugarman and Biloxi SF, LLC d/b/a Sugar Factory
Plaintiff:
Loop Linen Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
