Louisiana Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,622
Eiland v. Social Security
as 5:2025cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Melinda Kay Eiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Leblanc v. Colvin
as 6:2024cv01794
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Michelle Leblanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Willis v. Colvin
as 3:2024cv01043
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Teeko Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wright v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv01760
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jan Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Solar v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02893
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA
Plaintiff:
Deborah Soler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moses et al
as 2:2024cv02878
Petitioner:
Mykel Moses
Unknown:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCMAHON v. Colvin
as 2:2024cv02880
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER R. MCMAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fountain v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02876
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Kenneth Fountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Floyd v. Social Security
as 2:2024cv01692
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Todd Allen Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bertrand v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv01632
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Martha Bertrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
