District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Miller v. Savannah State University
as 4:2026cv00252
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01009
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Collins v. City of Broxton, Georgia et al
as 5:2026cv01008
Plaintiff:
Princess Collins
Defendant:
City of Broxton, Georgia and Hunter Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DURBIN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST
as 3:2026cv00108
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GRANT DURBIN
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lombard v. Williams et al
as 1:2026cv00138
Plaintiff:
Veronica Lombard
Defendant:
Steven Williams and Sheriff Joshua Hilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01197
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
ARNOLD v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2026cv00407
Petitioner:
TERRY B ARNOLD
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SHAWN GILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act, et seq
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Homestead Hospice et al
as 1:2015cv00840
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
