Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 31,144
Green v. Brooks
as 4:2019cv00269
Petitioner: Giberal Green
Respondent: Christopher M. Carr, Nathan Brooks, Elizabeth M. Haase
Not Yet Classified: Attorney General State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALLER v. CITY OF EATONTON GEORGIA et al
as 5:2019cv00417
Defendant: EATONTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF EATONTON GEORGIA, DETECTIVE HOWELL CARDWELL
Plaintiff: THURSTON C WALLER
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wilcher
as 4:2019cv00268
Defendant: Sheriff John T. Wilcher
Plaintiff: Tavoris L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Unites States of America
as 1:2019cv00182
Petitioner: Diamante Donzay Copeland
Respondent: Unites States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
THIGPEN v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00176
Defendant: Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, LOUIS SCHOFIELD
Plaintiff: RONNIE THIGPEN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bannister v. Chatham County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2019cv00266
Defendant: Summitt Food Service, Chatham County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff: Ashawn W. Bannister
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Chatham County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2019cv00267
Defendant: Chatham County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff: Leeverest Curry
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Burkhalter et al
as 4:2019cv00241
Defendant: Floyd County Lt. Kess Ploff, Floyd County Sheriff Tim Burkhalter, Floyd County Major Robert Sapp and others
Plaintiff: Victor Manuel DeJesus
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2019cv00416
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: JOHN RANDALL
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rashad v. Jordan et al
as 4:2019cv00242
Defendant: S/O B. Jordan, Sheriff Tim Burkhalter
Plaintiff: Hassan Shareef Rashad
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?