US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18,614
Pinkston v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv04459
Plaintiff:
Jabarr Desmond Pinkston
Defendant:
Ezell Brown and Sgt. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. USA
as 1:2023cv04468
Petitioner:
Enobahkare Peterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Peterson v. USA
as 1:2023cv04469
Petitioner:
Enobahkare Peterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04467
Petitioner:
Terrell Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv04466
Plaintiff:
Terrel Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Brian Steel, Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Beaubrun Jr. v. Cariglio
as 1:2023cv04410
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Beaubrun Jr.
Defendant:
Gennaro Cariglio, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv04404
Plaintiff:
Saleeban Mahmet Ali and Saleeban Adan
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Forte v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv04378
Petitioner:
Calvin Deondre Forte
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
