US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,070
Edison v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv01800
Petitioner:
Jermaine A Edison
Respondent:
A Thomas, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01795
Petitioner:
Michael Renaldo Turner
Respondent:
Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Willie Carl Porter, III
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Finks et al
as 1:2024cv01788
Plaintiff:
Ronnie H West
Defendant:
Michael H. Finks and Cobb County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Barriard
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
William M. Taylor
Defendant:
Terry E. Barriard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Unit Manager Porter and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
