Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Rabon v. Jackson et al
as 1:2026cv00528
Defendant:
Warden James Ward and Sheriff Heath Jackson
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Darrol Rabon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ATWOOD v. WARDEN
as 3:2026cv00296
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE ATWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. Jasper City Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv00506
Defendant:
Jasper Texas State Trooper Department, Clint Fowler, FNU Coons and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal Lynn Stratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Name Unknown
as 9:2026cv00995
Defendant:
Name Unknown
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. KCPD et al
as 8:2026cv00711
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, Kansas City, Missouri, Jonathan Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil D. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Haley
as 7:2026cv00903
Defendant:
Alexa Haley
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Haley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sepulveda v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2026cv09355
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Frank Sepulveda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv13721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NETZER v. HEIFNER et al
as 4:2026cv00601
Defendant:
DARYL TYUS and LEAH HEIFNER
Plaintiff:
BRETT NETZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronowski v. CCOC et al
as 1:2026cv14156
:
Service List
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County IL Board Members and CCOC
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ronowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
