Guam Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Weymouth v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv00004
Plaintiff:
Julien Weymouth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Aguon v. Ricolcol
as 1:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
Francisco B. Aguon
Defendant:
E. Ricolcol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Certeza v. Borja et al
as 1:2025cv00007
Plaintiff:
Julio Quenga Certeza
Defendant:
Allen Borja, Department of Corrections, Randall Cunliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valentine v. USA
as 1:2025cv00003
Petitioner:
Shaylene Doris Valentine
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martinez v. Perez
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joyce Martinez and Brian Jason Martinez
Defendant:
Vernon Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quintanilla v. Guam Superior Court Honorable Judge Lamorena et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Guam Warden Allan Borja and Guam Superior Court Honorable Judge Lamorena
Plaintiff:
Eli Charfauros Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esperon v. Bordallo
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
James J. Esperon
Defendant:
Fred Bordallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Lee Lopez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Damai v. USA
as 1:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Vhavna Kumari Damai
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Untalan v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00029
Petitioner:
Maria E.L. Untalan
Respondent:
Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
