Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 197,284
Martin v. Borowics et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00697
Defendant:
Pamela Harris, Dr. Borowics and Katrina Brown
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barris (PS) v. Starr et al
as 1:2024cv03057
Defendant:
John McGaugh, United States Department of Justice, Yangas and others
Plaintiff:
Gene L. Barris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv03061
Defendant:
James, C.D.O.C./ Moses (Andre) Stancil, Ellington and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTED v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WHITTED
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and OKALOOSA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. FLAGG
as 4:2024cv00443
Defendant:
FLAGG
Plaintiff:
STONEY GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diemer v. State of Florida
as 3:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Daniel Diemer
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Hyer et al
as 6:2024cv01992
Defendant:
Brenard, B. Balagia and A. Hyer
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Hunter, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillen v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01439
Defendant:
Lisa Draper, . Foltz, Ryan Bohm and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Guillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springs v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01440
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Samantha Wurster, . Alford and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springs v. Durtch et al
as 4:2024cv04200
Defendant:
. Stodolkiewicz, Jason Lippens, Robert Helton and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.