District Court Cases in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 85,101
First Advantage Enterprise Screening Corporation v International Golden Foods, LLC
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
First Advantage Enterprise Screening Corporation
Defendant:
International Golden Foods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
King v. Sharp Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Rhonda King
Defendant:
Sharp Holding, Inc., Robert B. Sharp and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McLaughlin v. Williams Industries, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Thomas McLaughlin
Defendant:
Williams Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Family and Medical Leave Act
Williams v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00467
Petitioner:
Jamal Williams
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdul-Sabur v. House of Delegates et al
as 3:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Wakeel Abdul-Sabur
Defendant:
House of Delegates and State Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Kennard Eugene Hall
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Allen v. Good et al
as 7:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Defendant:
Sally Good, Sgt. Widener, Ofc. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
