Virginia Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,606
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00055
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Marie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Mullins v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00469
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Tammy Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Webster Jackson
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wekony v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00449
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Carmen A. Wekony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santos v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00503
Interested Party:
Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice and SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Elizabeth Santos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
L.N.P. v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv01196
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and The Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
L.N.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Rogers v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Rogers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Webster v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
David Allen Webster
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Knight v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00416
Petitioner:
Rebecca Gabrielle Knight
Respondent:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
