Fourth Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 415,983
Montgomery v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv04008
Petitioner: Keith Lamont Montgomery
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
US v. Gregory Largent
as 17-7234
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GREGORY LARGENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Samuel Whitner v. Larry Cartledge
as 17-7232
Petitioner - Appellant: SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER, a/k/a Samuel L. Whitner
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE
AirFacts, Inc. v. Diego De Amezaga
as 17-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant: AIRFACTS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: DIEGO DE AMEZAGA
Adrian Rome v. Mack
as 17-7233
Plaintiff - Appellant: ADRIN KENTRAL ROME
Defendant - Appellee: MACK, Officer, FREY, Sgt. Officer
Defendant: FRYE, SGT., H.R.R.J. 3/6, BOB MCCABE, Interim Superintendent
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Annette Riley Clarke
as 17-2095
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: ANNETTE I. RILEY CLARKE, a/k/a Annette I. Riley
Defendant: MARLON CLARKE, CACH, LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
EQT Production Company v. The Kay Company, LLC
as 17-380
Petitioner: EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, EQT CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, EQT ENERGY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Respondent: THE KAY COMPANY LLC, WILLIAM CATHER, Trustee of Diana Goff Cather Trusts, JAMES E. HAMRIC, III, and All Other Persons and Entities Similarly Situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2096
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
In re: Christopher Cottrell
as 17-379
Movant: In re: CHRISTOPHER EARL COTTRELL
:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?