Fourth Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 453,269
Jones et al v. Chan et al
as 1:2019cv01744
Respondent: Brian Chan, Professional Choice, Inc.
Petitioner: Bobvita Jones, Phillip Anthony Jones
Cause Of Action: Application for order confirming award of arbitrators
Clarke Veneers and Plywood, Inc. v. Mentakab Veneer & Plywood SDN BHD
as 1:2019cv01738
Defendant: Mentakab Veneer & Plywood, SDN BHD
Plaintiff: Clarke Veneers and Plywood, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Westenskow v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2019cv01739
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: James Westenskow
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01740
Defendant: Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Eugene W Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Rail Safety Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Asbestos Workers Local 24 Medical Fund et al v. Z & E Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01743
Plaintiff: Matthew Stillitano, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Medical Fund, Wilfredo Mata and others
Defendant: Z&E Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Obermeyer v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01750
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sandra Obermeyer
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Dyer v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 3:2019cv00458
Plaintiff: Parker Dyer
Defendant: GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Civil Shell Case Opening
Chung et al v. Scholl et al
as 1:2019cv01746
Defendant: keystone Coal Company, Tom Scholl
Plaintiff: Christopher Chung, In yong chung
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Contract Default
Reiten et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc
as 1:2019cv01747
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc
Plaintiff: Ann Reiten, Louis Crescenti
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Tanner v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01748
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tammy Tanner
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?