Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 90,398
Phillip Fields v. David Robinson
as 17-6231
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILLIP W. FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID ROBINSON, Chief Corrections Operations, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Regional Administrator and others
Steven Dixon Prentice v. Barry Edwards
as 17-6230
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE
Defendant - Appellee: BARRY EDWARDS, Unit Manager - FTC Oklahoma, HSA GRISMER, Health Services Administrator - FCI El Reno, H.A. LEDEZMA, Warden (former) - FCI El Reno and others
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS, ADRIAN TOWE, Unit Team Counselor - FCI Butner
US v. Toby Joseph Mase
as 17-6227
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TOBY JOSEPH MASE
Ray Brown v. Earl Barksdale
as 17-6226
Petitioner - Appellant: RAY W. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee: EARL BARKSDALE, Warden
Timothy Wims v. Warden
as 17-6224
Petitioner - Appellant: TIMOTHY WIMS, a/k/a Timothy Derrinado Davis, a/k/a John Darren Delgado
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Edgefield
Deontai McDuffie v. Sergeant M. Williams
as 17-6218
Plaintiff - Appellant: JYNEEL DEONTAI MCDUFFIE
Defendant - Appellee: SERGEANT M. WILLIAMS, ASSOCIATE WARDEN WILLIE DAVIS
US v. Malcolm Melvin
as 17-6219
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MALCOLM ROBERT LEE MELVIN
Whisnant v. Hill et al
as 5:2017ct03047
Plaintiff: Eric Allen Whisnant
Defendant: C/O Hill, C/O Dawson, Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
SLADE v. USA
as 1:2017cv00143
Petitioner: ARTIS EUGENE SLADE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017hc02036
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?