Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 138,995
Cole v. The United States of America
as 1:2025cv00502
Plaintiff:
Vincent M. Cole
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
as 5:2025hc02043
Petitioner:
Jimmy Sinclair
Respondent:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corso v. Ishee et al
as 5:2025ct03034
Plaintiff:
Leland Thomas Corso, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Monica Bond, Donnie R. Raynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbin v. USA
as 7:2025cv00897
Petitioner:
Kendrick Naveed Corbin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morgan v. United States of America
as 5:2025cv00894
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prillman v. Bienemy
as 2:2025cv00097
Petitioner:
LaMar Prillman
Respondent:
J. Bienemy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Whitehurst et al
as 2:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
Chauncey L. Walker
Defendant:
T. Whitehurst, R. Galloway, K. Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Whapham et al
as 2:2025cv00093
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Whapham and Pill Call Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Satter v. John Doe Transportation Officers et al
as 2:2025cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derrick Satter
Defendant:
John Doe Transportation Officers, John Doe and Coffeewood Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.