Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 134,183
Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02880
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Charlie Anderson, Mrs. Fripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Al-Haqq v. Stirling et al
as 2:2024cv02884
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Kershaw Warden, Kershaw Grievance Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenton v. USA
as 5:2024cv81552
Petitioner:
Percival Norman Fenton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LoCascio v. Virgil et al
as 7:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Geno A. LoCascio
Defendant:
Sgt. Virgil, Officer Gardner, Officer Grogalucki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Kennety et al
as 7:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Kennety, Johnson and Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLeon v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2024ct03107
Plaintiff:
Abel DeLeon
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCorkle v. USA
as 3:2024cv00460
Petitioner:
Antwon McCorkle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bautista v. USA
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Alexis Noe Bautista
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
