Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 41,033
Arrington v. Adams
as 7:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Javon Lamont Arrington
Defendant:
J. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrel Fisher v. Elijah Roberts
as 23-6916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREL R. FISHER
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIJAH ROBERTS
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv04671
Plaintiff:
Michael James Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America and Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richmond v. Cox et al
as 7:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Garth Daniel Richmond
Defendant:
Corrections Officer T. Cox and Corrections Officer A. Castle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Paults et al
as 7:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. May
Defendant:
Kevin Paults, Middle River Jail and Staff and Chuck D. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 5:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Johnson
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Warden R. Brown and Chaplain Hong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JENNINGS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RONALD JENNINGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Gazich v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2023cv04682
Plaintiff:
Michael Gazich
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lawhorn v. Mayle et al
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawhorn
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Patrick Mayle, Nurse Jane Doe and Nurse John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrentine v. Richland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv04656
Plaintiff:
Laurrinda Dayvon Barrentine
Defendant:
Richland County Sheriff's Department and Manuel Y Gordillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
