Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 43,286
MCMASTER v. PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00631
Defendant:
CAPTAIN BROWN, CORPORAL T. KLUK, MS JO and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MCMASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Banks et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Juanece Banks, Frederick Russell and others
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Defendant:
Eva D. Moore, Eric Aldridge, George M. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ganzie v. Youngkin et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
Lloyd Banks, Governor Glenn Youngkin, Samuel Boone and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ganzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Sareena et al
as 7:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Philander McFarland
Defendant:
Dankwa Vibeke, Sareena Scott and Pamela Polly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Thomas v. Danville Police Department
as 7:2024cv00482
Defendant:
Danville Police Department
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helton v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00484
Defendant:
Gloria Kelley, Dreama Owens, Marge Mullins and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Nicole Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Large et al
as 7:2024cv00485
Defendant:
Crystal Large and Shah
Plaintiff:
Jullian A. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Defendant:
General Counsel, Regional Director and Warden E. Rokosky
Plaintiff:
Lonnie L. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv04137
Defendant:
Sheriff James Hudson
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
