District Court Cases in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 141,190
Willis v. American Red Cross Mid Atlantic Region et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Defendant:
American Red Cross Mid Atlantic Region and Anthony Smith
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Akiba Matthews
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Armstrong v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Ronald Armstrong
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flint v. Staff at Hazelton USP
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Mark Louis Flint, II
Defendant:
Staff at Hazelton USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Perez v. Alderson FPC et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Respondent:
Alderson FPC, Unit Manager Ms. Dillon, Case Manager Ms. Walton and others
Petitioner:
Tatiana Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kinlaw v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00562
Petitioner:
Timothy Kinlaw
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fickling v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00563
Petitioner:
Riheem Fickling
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chrisman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00564
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Matthew Brent Chrisman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Spence v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ann Spence
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Castro v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00553
Respondent:
Mr. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Christian Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
