Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Craddock v. OpenAi OpCo LLC
as 3:2026cv06920
Plaintiff:
Shemeca Craddock
Defendant:
OpenAi OpCo LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Krenning v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2026cv03206
Plaintiff:
Aislyn Krenning
Defendant:
Incorporated Medtronic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
OLMO v. BLANK ROME LLP
as 2:2026cv04719
Plaintiff:
VINCENT OLMO
Defendant:
BLANK ROME LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Watson v. Sharp Property Management
as 3:2026cv05744
Plaintiff:
Jesse Carter Watson
Defendant:
Sharp Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Property Damage
Gomez et al v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
as 2:2026cv07351
Plaintiff:
Ian Gomez and John Whalen
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LINCOLN v. FUTUREDONTICS, LLC
as 1:2026cv24625
Plaintiff:
LARIESHA LINCOLN
Defendant:
FUTUREDONTICS, LLC doing business as 1-800-DENTIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
SANTANA v. BLANK ROME LLP
as 2:2026cv04661
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SANTANA
Defendant:
BLANK ROME LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mathis v. TOWER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC.
as 5:2026cv04656
Plaintiff:
Melody Mathis
Defendant:
TOWER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (d)(5)(B) Diversity of Citizenship under CAFA
Stiles v. MAVA Healthcare System, LLC
as 4:2026cv05311
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Stiles
Defendant:
MAVA Healthcare System, LLC doing business as MAVA Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Li v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2026cv01734
Plaintiff:
Ting Li
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
