Eighth Circuit Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 364,102
Securitas Security Services USA Inc v. Arkansas Continued Care LLC et al
as 4:2025cv00355
Plaintiff:
Securitas Security Services USA Inc
Defendant:
Arkansas Continued Care LLC and Arkansas Continued Care Hospital of Jonesboro LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Guy v. USA
as 4:2025cv00350
Petitioner:
Curtis Darnell Guy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ferguson v. Morgan et al
as 4:2025cv00351
Plaintiff:
Darla Ferguson
Defendant:
Jamie Morgan, Asthildur Loa Thorsdottir, Ebrahim Rasool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Morgan et al
as 4:2025cv00352
Plaintiff:
Robert Eaton
Defendant:
Jamie Morgan, Asthildur Loa Thorsdottir, Ebrahim Rasool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Morgan et al
as 4:2025cv00353
Plaintiff:
Heather McNew Carter
Defendant:
Jamie Morgan, Asthildur Loa Thorsdottir, Ebrahim Rasool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foust v. Morgan et al
as 4:2025cv00354
Plaintiff:
Angela Foust
Defendant:
Jamie Morgan, Asthildur Loa Thorsdottir, Ebrahim Rasool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Presley
as 3:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Shanaye Williams
Defendant:
Patrick Presley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bordeaux v. S D State Women's Prison
as 4:2025cv00356
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Rowane Bordeaux
Defendant:
S D State Women's Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bordeaux v. S D State Women's Prison
as 4:2025cv00357
Plaintiff:
Lachara Maire Bordeaux
Defendant:
S D State Women's Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
