Eighth Circuit Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 320,922
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03117
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00610
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
White v. Nunag et al
as 4:2022cv00613
Plaintiff: Roderick White
Defendant: Nunag and Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Davison et al
as 3:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: Clarence Anderson
Defendant: Davison, Tyler Robinson, Cagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00611
Plaintiff: Angela Moses
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rode et al v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 4:2022cv00612
Plaintiff: Joseph P Rode and Jolene K Danielson
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Buchanan v. Melton et al
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff: Christopher Buchanan
Defendant: Corey Melton, Baker, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff: Clarence Anderson
Defendant: Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Plaintiff: Clarence Anderson
Defendant: Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addison v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff: Tristin Addison
Defendant: Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?