District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 67,854
King v. Wyles et al
as 3:2025cv00060
Plaintiff:
Natasha King
Defendant:
Andrew Wyles, Steven Milligan and Gosnell School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Cid v. Stalhood
as 2:2025cv00058
Plaintiff:
Elfego Cid
Defendant:
C Stalhood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Strong v. Payne
as 4:2025cv00281
Plaintiff:
Richard Leon Strong
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Grahm et al
as 2:2025cv00057
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Smith
Defendant:
Curtis Grahm and Anterio Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Do No Harm et al v. Sanders
as 4:2025cv00282
Plaintiff:
Do No Harm and Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism Inc
Defendant:
Sarah Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv05067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. McCormick Painting Company Inc et al
as 4:2025cv00280
Plaintiff:
Finishing Trades Institute, International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, International Painters and Allied Trades Annuity Plan and others
Defendant:
McCormick Painting Company Inc and McCormick Industrial Abatement Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Higgins v. Lane et al
as 2:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, William F Straughn, Mose Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
