Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Powelson v. Mathers et al
as 3:2026cv06305
Plaintiff:
Robbie Powelson
Defendant:
Brian Mathers and City of Sausalito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hampton v. Mercer
as 3:2026cv00243
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Josh Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Avondale, City of et al
as 2:2026cv04413
Plaintiff:
Ashley Bradley
Defendant:
Avondale, City of, Celso Avila, Valente Peru and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2026cv00177
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene and Valerie Stephen
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kennon et al v. University of Central Arkansas Board of Trustees et al
as 4:2026cv00619
Defendant:
Johanna Robertson, University of Central Arkansas Board of Trustees, University of Central Arkansas Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
J'Veyon Pierre Kennon and Victoria Kennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
