Alaska Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,004
Emrit v. Musk et al
as 3:2025cv00007
Defendant:
Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, Department of Government Efficiency and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 "also known as" (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United States of Emrits
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kozevnikoff v. Haley
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Bryon Kozevnikoff
Defendant:
Brian Haley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Pitzer et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Defendant:
Mary Kennedy, Anna Ralph, Kira Pitzer and others
Plaintiff:
George M. Romero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero, Jr. v. Smoot, et al.
as 4:2024cv00031
Defendant:
Sarah Possenti, Nathan Smoot and Jeff Edwards
Plaintiff:
George Moises Romero, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. McAfee et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Defendant:
Jeffrey Scott McAfee, Greg Workman and Melinda Rae McAfee
Plaintiff:
George Moises Romero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
