Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Whitfield v. Duns Bradstreet
as 1:2026cv05022
Plaintiff:
Demitrius R. Whitfield
Defendant:
Duns Bradstreet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Middlebrooks v. King et al
as 1:2026cv04643
Plaintiff:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Kay Ann King and Chris Hosey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Hempstead Village Housing Associates, L.P. et al
as 2:2026cv05012
Plaintiff:
Jermaine J. Jackson
Defendant:
Hempstead Village Housing Associates, L.P. and WB Residential Communities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
ADAMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv02889
Plaintiff:
DENNIS GEORGE ADAMS, JR., JEROD THOMAS BARGAR, CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH BELLIVEAU and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Balmadrid v. Rauf
as 1:2026cv09884
Plaintiff:
Jose C. Balmadrid
Defendant:
Mohammed Rauf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Milburn v. Patterson et al
as 4:2026cv06752
Plaintiff:
Jonia Milburn
Defendant:
Gregory Patterson, The Blue Bird Circle and Sally Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cherry v. Labarre
as 4:2026cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kystal Cherry
Defendant:
Zachary Labarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Connolly v. LaSalle et al
as 1:2026cv02701
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector LaSalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Connolly v. Lasalle et al
as 1:2026cv00143
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector Lasalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Connolly (PS) v. Lasalle et al
as 1:2026cv03763
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector Lasalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
