Maine Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 712
BOHAN v. PICORD et al
as 2:2020cv00268
Defendant:
SANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATT BOCHOE, STACEY NEWTON
and others
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY BOHAN
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
ALI v. CITY OF PORTLAND et al
as 2:2020cv00255
Defendant:
SUNA SHAW, CITY OF PORTLAND, JEFFREY DRUAN
and others
Plaintiff:
MUMINA ALI
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
GENESIS II CHURCH OF HEALTH & HEALING et al v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
DONALD GEYER WATERMAN, JAKE GEYER WATERMAN, TIANA LYNN SMALL
and others
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA)
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
DYER v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00224
Defendant:
LOUIS ST. PIERRE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTOPHER WILSON
and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER J DYER
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
BOND v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
TROY JACKSON, MATTHEW DUNLAP, JANET MILLS
and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY BOND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. MURRAY et al
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
ROBERT YOUNG, JAMES M MURRAY, MICHAEL SAUSCHUCK
Plaintiff:
KHALIF WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
SPARKS v. MILLS et al
as 2:2020cv00190
Defendant:
LAURA FORTMAN, JANET MILLS, RANDALL LIBERTY
Plaintiff:
MARC SPARKS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
JURKENAS et al v. CITY OF BREWER et al
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
CITY OF BREWER, STEWART BROOKS, STEVEN BOST
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E JURKENAS, PATRICIA M JURKENAS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
BAYLEY'S CAMPGROUND INC et al v. MILLS
as 2:2020cv00176
Plaintiff:
DOLORES HUMISTON, DMJ PARKS LLC, CURTIS BONNELL
and others
Defendant:
JANET MILLS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
BARKER v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00163
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, YORK COUNTY, KEVIN MCCORMICK
and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARKER
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
