District of Maine Civil Rights Cases
Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 556
GROSS v. WEINER et al
as 1:2016cv00475
Plaintiff:
DANE ERIC GROSS
Defendant:
ALLAN H WEINER, WEINER BROADCASTING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
EMERY et al v. ADVANCE PIERRE FOODS INC
as 2:2016cv00470
Plaintiff:
JOHN EMERY , ROBERT RAINVILLE
Defendant:
ADVANCE PIERRE FOODS INC
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Age)
DEPAOLO v. OCEAN PROPERTIES LTD et al
as 2:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
CARY DEPAOLO
Defendant:
OCEAN PROPERTIES LTD, GHM PORTLAND MAR LLC
Cause Of Action: American Disabilities Act
BELISLE v. ROTONDI et al
as 1:2016cv00451
Plaintiff:
AUDREY BELISLE
Defendant:
TRACEY H ROTONDI, DONNA COURTEMANCHE, MARK O MUNN
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. GLOBAL MONTELLO GROUP CORP
as 2:2016cv00418
Plaintiff:
CAROL A DAVIS
Defendant:
GLOBAL MONTELLO GROUP CORP
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
SOLOMON v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
TANISHA SOLOMON
Defendant:
THOMAS MURPHY , UNKNOWN OFFICERS , MIKE BUSSIERE
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
KRAH v. COUNTY OF LINCOLN MAINE et al
as 2:2016cv00415
Plaintiff:
CHASTITY KRAH
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LINCOLN MAINE , HAMILTON MESERVE , WILLIAM BLODGETT
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
JAMES v. BUENO et al
as 1:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL J JAMES
Defendant:
ERIC BUENO, RANDALL LIBERTY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
SEDGEWICK ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
RANDALL LIBERTY , MARSHA ALEXANDER , COREY GOODCHILD
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
DAY et al v. TOWN OF BUXTON et al
as 2:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
STACEY DAY , GREGORY HOAR , MICHAEL CROCKETT
Defendant:
TOWN OF BUXTON , MICHAEL S GROVO , KEVIN COLLINS
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.