Maine Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 927
THOMPSON v. JOYCE et al
as 2:2024cv00360
Defendant:
KEVIN J JOYCE, COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND and JAMES GAILEY, H
Plaintiff:
VINAL THOMPSON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TIGER v. PAWS ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Defendant:
PAWS ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER, RICK J RUBIN, MUNICIPALITY OF ROCKPORT and others
Plaintiff:
MS TIGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WALES V. MERRINVIL
as 2:2024cv00338
Defendant:
KERRY H MERRINVIL
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY R WALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
JOHNSON v. COLVIN POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv00324
Defendant:
COLVIN POST OFFICE and JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00314
Defendant:
JOSHUA SOUCY, CODY HOUSTON, ADMINISTRATOR PIKE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOLLEY v. SEBAGO et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Defendant:
BRADLEY PLANTE and TOWN OF SEBAGO
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOOLLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SMALL v. BINGHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00313
Defendant:
TOWN OF BINGHAM, STEVEN STEWARD and DEPUTY ASHLEY SMITH
Plaintiff:
DAIGAN C SMALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EARLES v. SAGADAHOC COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES #1-5, SAGADAHOC COUNTY, WILLIAM FRITH and others
Plaintiff:
LATOYA EARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
WATERVILLE HEALTH & WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARRETT et al v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN et al
as 1:2024cv00300
Defendant:
MONAGHAN LEAHY LLP, AROOSTOOK COUNTY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN, B MALLONEE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID T MARRETT and SANDY MARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
