First Circuit Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 110,806
Adams v. Cranston, RI, et al
as 17-1836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD KENNETH ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRANSTON, RI, CRANSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Adams v. Campo, et al
as 17-1835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD KENNETH ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE CAMPO, PAUL CAMPO
Wescott v. Zenk
as 17-1833
Petitioner:
RICHARD R. WESCOTT
Respondent:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden, NH State Prison
Interested Party:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mariano v. US
as 17-1834
Petitioner - Appellant:
RALPH M. MARIANO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Oquendo-Lorenzo, et al v. Hospital San Antonio, Inc.
as 17-1810
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JESSICA OQUENDO-LORENZO, personally and on behalf of her conjugal partnership with Rolando Lopez Montanez, ROLANDO LOPEZ-MONTANEZ, personally and on behalf on his conjugal partnership with Jessica Oquendo Lorenzo
Defendant - Appellant:
HOSPITAL SAN ANTONIO, INC., or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital San Antonio
Defendant - Appellee:
OSVALDO QUILES-GIOVANNETTI, NATIONAL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO, MARKETFORM NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF MID AMERICA
and others
United States of America et al v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv11517
Cause Of Action: False Claims Act
Zhang v. Acacia Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11518
Plaintiff:
Hui Zhang
Defendant:
Acacia Communications, Inc., Murugesan Shanmugaraj, John F. Gavin
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Larry R. Schneider v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2017cv11516
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Lath v. Dufresne, et al
as 17-1826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANJEEV LATH
Defendant - Appellee:
GERARD DUFRESNE, BETTY MULLEN, OAK BROOK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Oak Brook Associates
Defendant:
CHERYL VALLEE, PERRY VALLEE, WILLIAM QUINN MOREY
and others
Interested Party:
JARED DUFRESNE, NH EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, NEW HAMPSHIRE UNION LEADER
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
