First Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,088
Winch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv30131
Plaintiff:
Matthew Winch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
John v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2026cv30132
Plaintiff:
Lester A. John
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and C.R.A. Community Redevelopment Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Correia v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv13622
Plaintiff:
April Correia
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv30128
Plaintiff:
Robby Loren Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Camara v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv13587
Plaintiff:
Deolinda Camara
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Howard v. Bisignano
as 4:2026cv13604
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Porciello v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv13589
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Porciello
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Travassos v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv13600
Plaintiff:
Demitry Travassos
Defendant:
Commissioner Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Laboy v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv13580
Plaintiff:
Victoria Laboy
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crystal A. v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00525
Plaintiff:
Crystal Ash
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
