U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 70,071
WirelessWERX IP LLC v. POINTR USA LIMITED
as 1:2025cv10391
Plaintiff:
WirelessWERX IP LLC
Defendant:
POINTR USA LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Miah v. Morgan Stanley and Co. International PLC et al
as 1:2025cv10381
Plaintiff:
Habib Miah
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley and Co. International PLC and Eaton Vance Managment International LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hunt v. Prelude Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv10387
Plaintiff:
David Hunt
Defendant:
Prelude Research, Inc. and Spencer Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Davis v. Lyft, Inc.
as 1:2025cv10390
Plaintiff:
Tamra Davis
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Gamble v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2025cv10388
Plaintiff:
Larry Gamble
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Escher et al v. Noble et al
as 1:2025cv10389
Plaintiff:
Mark Escher, GUN OWNERS ACTION LEAGUE, INC., Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Colonel Geoffrey Noble, Commisioner Jaime Gagnon and Chief Heath Eldredge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patel v. Albright et al
as 3:2025cv30028
Plaintiff:
Nishith Patel
Defendant:
Anne K Albright, Theresa M Chernosky, Stuart R Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caceres v. Seven Hills Foundation
as 4:2025cv40024
Plaintiff:
Mirca B. Caceres
Defendant:
Seven Hills Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv10382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv10383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
