U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,146
Dutcher v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2025cv11776
Plaintiff:
John Dutcher
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Jim Seney, Sally Nieves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Soto et al v. Skipper
as 1:2025cv11755
Plaintiff:
Karen Soto and Student Doe
Defendant:
Mary Benson Skipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Okogun v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 1:2025cv11731
Plaintiff:
Reuben Okogun
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Buley v. Kozloski et al
as 4:2025cv40080
Plaintiff:
Daryl Buley
Defendant:
Stephen Kozloski, Town of Monson, John R Morrell and others
Witne:
PETER WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Buley v. Kozloski et al
as 3:2025cv40080
Plaintiff:
Daryl Buley
Defendant:
Stephen Kozloski, Town of Monson, John R Morrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miranda v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2025cv11719
Plaintiff:
Luis Miranda
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Courthouse News Service v. Ambrosino
as 1:2025cv11705
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Thomas Ambrosino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cross v. Lavoie et al
as 1:2025cv11707
Plaintiff:
Emily Cross
Defendant:
Matthew Lavoie and Richard Cosgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
