Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,687
F. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2026cv14385
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
M.E. F., M.I. F and E. F.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
DE JESUS-ROMANO v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
as 2:2026cv14289
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC
Plaintiff:
JUAN DE JESUS-ROMANO
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Andrew Morrison v. Department of the Navy
as 26-2598
Defendant:
M.N.C.C., Navy Personnel Command Center and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MORRISON
Nelson v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 1:2026cv09511
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2026cv03042
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RR
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MARTINEZ v. UNION PACIFIC RR
as 1:2026cv03041
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RR
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
KAY v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
as 2:2026cv14111
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP.
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KAY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MARTINEZ v. UNION PACIFIC RR
as 1:2026cv03043
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RR
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hopkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2026cv13215
Plaintiff:
Leon Hopkins
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
TYLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2026cv03431
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E. TYLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
