Eighth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 696
Quick v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Deon Quick
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Spaight v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Mark Spaight
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Richardson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Richardson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Liles v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Liles
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Lampley v. Hopkins
as 6:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Lampley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rushman v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rushman
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Railcrew Xpress, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Lampley v. Hopkins
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Lampley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Galloway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Galloway, IV
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Christensen v. Soo Line Railroad Company
as 0:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Dean Christensen
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company doing business as Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Ellis v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ellis
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Kimberly Adkins, Dale Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
