District Court Cases in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 92,872
Kostial et al v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv01206
Plaintiff:
Laura Kostial and Robert Kostial
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gaines v. Windsor C-1 School Board et al
as 4:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gaines
Defendant:
Windsor C-1 School Board, Dr. Rachel Montgomery, Dr. Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sproaps v. Brown et al
as 4:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Marriell Sproaps
Defendant:
Kevin Brown and Rickey Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Johnson v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00165
Petitioner:
Antione Johnson
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Lordi v. Liang et al
as 4:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Susan Lordi doing business as Willow Tree
Defendant:
Rongwang Liang, Yao Guo and Shenzhen Yucheng Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Wilson v. USA
as 3:2023cv05027
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Traylor v. Mission Rock Residential Missouri, LLC
as 4:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Traylor
Defendant:
Mission Rock Residential Missouri, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
