Eastern District of Arkansas Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 29,215
Thurman v. Adams et al
as 5:2015cv00169
Plaintiff: Brandon D Thurman
Defendant: Edward Adams, C Hunter
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan et al v. Affiliated Foods Southwest Inc
as 4:2015cv00296
Plaintiff: Brenda Morgan , Donna Kellett
Defendant: Affiliated Foods Southwest Inc
Trustee: Richard L Cox
Cause Of Action: Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Jenkins v. USA
as 4:2015cv00295
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Romondo Jenkins
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roberts v. Lumber Liquidators Inc et al
as 4:2015cv00292
Plaintiff: Terri Roberts
Defendant: Lumber Liquidators Inc, Lumber Liquidators Holdings Inc, Lumber Liquidators Leasing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Engstrom v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00297
Plaintiff: David William Engstrom
Defendant: Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Townsend
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jones et al
as 4:2015cv00294
Plaintiff: Sheila Smith
Defendant: Gail R Jones, Tommy Wenseleck
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
St Vincent Infirmary Medical Center Inc v. Professional Clinical Laboratory Inc
as 4:2015cv00289
Plaintiff: St Vincent Infirmary Medical Center Inc
Defendant: Professional Clinical Laboratory Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chipman v. Mississippi County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2015cv00143
Plaintiff: Kimberly Chipman
Defendant: Mississippi County Sheriff's Department, Dale Cook
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Graves
as 4:2015cv00290
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Anderson
Defendant: Graves
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Champion v. Bland et al
as 5:2015cv00168
Plaintiff: Jerry Champion
Defendant: Estella Bland, Doe, Janet Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.