US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,918
Richardson v. Bennett et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Torris Richardson
Defendant:
Jason Palmer, Doe and F Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lang v. Straughn et al
as 3:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Kenny Cantrell, Thomas Hurst, Michael B Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Charles Gentry Rodgers
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lambert v. Payne et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Defendant:
Nurzuhal Faust, Jamie Campbell, Don Hackney and others
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lambert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00637
Defendant:
Joey Shamlin, Joe Traylor, Dexter Payne and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Higgins v. Coleman et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Defendant:
Smith, Timothy Owen, Mose Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Travon Dshun Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00612
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Kayla Emsweller and K Emsweller
Plaintiff:
Laquincy Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Larry Edmond Williams
Defendant:
Chris Wieland, Kimberly Dunn, Karvarious Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laughlin v. Norton et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Defendant:
A Norton and J Palmer
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00617
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Nelson and Barry Hyde
Plaintiff:
Branden J Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
