US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,769
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Owen Watson
Defendant: Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troka v. McCown et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Ethan Troka
Defendant: Patrick McCown, North Central Unit Chaple, Jeffery Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff: Ethan C Hill
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff: Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant: Dexter Payne, James Gibson and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. White et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00081
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Frederic v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: Philip P Frederic
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barefield v. USA
as 4:2024cv00424
Petitioner: Christopher Barefield
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cowgill v. Bland
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant: Estella Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibby v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff: Katherine Seward Gibby
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff: Stephan L Marshall
Defendant: Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?