U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,572
Johnson v. Ryals
as 4:2025cv00372
Plaintiff: Marcuiece LaMar Johnson
Defendant: Tim Ryals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Conway et al
as 4:2025cv00370
Plaintiff: Adam Lane
Defendant: Conway, Culclager and Stroughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gude v. Doe
as 2:2025cv00073
Plaintiff: Brian-Paul Alexander Gude
Defendant: Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mullikin v. Hollingsworth et al
as 4:2025cv00368
Plaintiff: Thomas Mullikin
Defendant: Terri Hollingsworth, Leon Johnson, Barry Hide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Barr v. FCI Forrest City Medium
as 2:2025cv00070
Plaintiff: Lord Judah Al-Barr
Defendant: FCI Forrest City Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pritchard v. Salthood
as 2:2025cv00071
Plaintiff: Steve Allen Pritchard
Defendant: Salthood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Porras v. Payne
as 4:2025cv00365
Plaintiff: Bryan Porras
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Ryals
as 4:2025cv00362
Plaintiff: David Lamont Conley
Defendant: Tim Ryals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bordeaux v. S D State Women's Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2025cv00356
Plaintiff: Rochelle Rowane Bordeaux
Defendant: S D State Women's Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bordeaux v. S D State Women's Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2025cv00357
Plaintiff: Lachara Maire Bordeaux
Defendant: S D State Women's Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?