US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,009
Moore v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2025cv00008
Plaintiff:
Richard Vernon Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dale v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00029
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Levi Isaac Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00017
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Beverly Smith, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Patrick v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00014
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Linda S Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Groves v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00011
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Sue Groves
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Summitt v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Rose M Summitt
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Marek v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dana Marek
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Elms v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Kurt E Elms
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Woten v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Paula Mae Woten
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hutto v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv01116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Hutto
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
