U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 57,567
Bronson Howard Tucker v. Dana Ratliffe-Walker
as 17-7230
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRONSON HOWARD TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
DANA RATLIFFE-WALKER, Warden Lunenberg Correctional Center
Jackie Adams v. Eric Wilson
as 17-7229
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACKIE VICTOR ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC D. WILSON
Lakhdeep Deol v. Gary Depreta
as 17-2089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKHDEEP DEOL
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY W. DEPRETA, DAWN M. DUROSS, DAVID B. LATOUR
Michael Holloway v. Lieutenant Taylor
as 17-7228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HOLLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT TAYLOR, correction officer, OFFICER BRADLEY, correction officer
Cristian Flores-Romero v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2087
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN VLADIMIR FLORES-ROMERO
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Turuk Saunders v. Warden of Broad River Prison
as 17-7227
Petitioner - Appellant:
TURUK SAUNDERS, a/k/a Turick Frazier
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Nicholas Peterson v. M.J.J., Inc.
as 17-2088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS PETERSON, JENA B. DANSON, CALI FITZGERALD, On Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff:
JANE LYNN HUBE, RYAN SCHOCHET, ERICA LYNN BLUNT
and others
Defendant - Appellee:
M.J.J., INC., trading as The Suburban House, MARK HOROWITZ
Joseph Saveri Law Firm Inc. v. Michael E. Criden, P.A.
as 17-2090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM INC., a California corporation, JOSEPH R. SAVERI
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. CRIDEN, P.A., d/b/a Criden & Love, P.A., a Florida corporation
Stephannie Javage v. General Motors LLC
as 17-2091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHANNIE JAVAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a Foreign Corporation
US v. Antoine Laws
as 17-4592
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTOINE DOUGLAS LAWS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
