U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 103
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
Bank of America Corporation v. US
as 23-2319
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, f/k/a NationsBank, f/k/a BankAmerica Corporation, f/k/a FleetBoston Financial Corporation, f/k/a BankBoston Corporation, f/k/a Summit Bancorp, f/k/a MBNA Corporation, f/k/a Merrill Lynch & Company, Incorporated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Arthur Stover
as 23-1288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR T. STOVER and GIGI STOVER
US v. Stephen Koncurat
as 22-2262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN R. KONCURAT and TAMARA K. KONCURAT
Eric Miller v. Colonial Pipeline Company
as 22-1735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC E. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY, STATE OF VIRGINIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Betsy Nicholson v. US
as 22-1623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETSY NICHOLSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Stephen Pond v. US
as 22-1537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN K. POND
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Altria Group, Inc. v. US
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALTRIA GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
