District Court Cases in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 86,002
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williams v. USA
as 1:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Donta Devoe Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hickman v. Wardlow
as 2:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Rickey A Hickman
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cradic v. Boyd
as 2:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Cradic
Defendant:
Bert C. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Fraley et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Porter, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Fraley, Matt Patterson, Steve Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Allen
as 1:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Anthony Wayne Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Ochoa et al v. Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02592
Plaintiff:
Lorena Ochoa, The Estate of Carlos Ochoa and Yolisma Ochoa
Defendant:
Classic Tile and Plaster, LLC, Jorge De Ochoa, Jorge De Ochoa, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Buckner v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 2:2023cv02590
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Buckner
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robinson v. Tansley et al
as 2:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roy Robinson
Defendant:
Dominique Tansley, Catrina Crabtree and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
