District Court Cases in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Toyota Boshoku America, Inc. et al v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 1:2026cv01244
Plaintiff:
Toyota Boshoku America, Inc. and TOYOTA BOSHOKU TENNESSEE LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Schock v. AMBULNZ TN, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv01348
Plaintiff:
Ava Schock
Defendant:
AMBULNZ TN, LLC and DOCGO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Eastman Chemical Company v. Daniel International Corporation
as 2:2026cv00209
Plaintiff:
Eastman Chemical Company
Defendant:
Daniel International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Smith v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2026cv00269
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Jeff Coffey, Captain Breeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Mattews v. Centerline Business Services, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv03235
Plaintiff:
Tamea T Mattews
Defendant:
Centerline Business Services, LLC, Southworth Business Services, LLC and Southworth Capital Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lafave v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01343
Plaintiff:
Dustin M. Lafave
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01345
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
