Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,174
Watson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00436
Petitioner: Preston Andrew Watson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blocker v. Genovese
as 1:2022cv01270
Petitioner: Maurice Blocker
Defendant: Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. Page et al
as 3:2022cv00994
Plaintiff: David A. Avery
Defendant: Roger A. Page, D. Michael Swiney, Arnold B. Goldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feather-Gorbey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00995
Plaintiff: Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant: United States of America, State of Kentucky, Governor and Attorney General, State of Virgina, Governor and Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Fitz
as 2:2022cv02832
Petitioner: Quincy D. Scott
Respondent: Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Conger et al
as 1:2022cv01271
Plaintiff: Jeremy Reid
Defendant: Scott Conger and AJ Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02833
Petitioner: Tony Bowen
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ware-Mustapha
as 2:2022cv02834
Petitioner: Eric Ware-Mustapha and Eric Ware
Respondent: Mr. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Slater v. Bowers
as 2:2022cv02835
Petitioner: Antonio M. Slater
Respondent: Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McLaughlin v. Drain et al
as 3:2022cv00988
Plaintiff: Darius Lamon McLaughlin
Defendant: Ladarius Drain, Joshua Jones and Frederick Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?