US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,387
Castro v. CoreCivic Inc.
as 3:2022cv00948
Plaintiff: Mark Castro
Defendant: CoreCivic Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Smith
as 3:2022cv00951
Plaintiff: Kimberly Craig
Defendant: Jennifer Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dotson v. Hall
as 3:2022cv00943
Petitioner: Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Respondent: Darron Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carroll v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv00942
Plaintiff: Al D. Carroll
Defendant: Christy Moore and Jennifer Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Henderson et al
as 3:2022cv00927
Plaintiff: Ryan Barnes
Defendant: f/n/u Henderson and Rutherford County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bawcom v. Roades et al
as 3:2022cv00923
Plaintiff: Ralph A. Bawcom, Jr.
Defendant: Dusty Roades, f/n/u l/n/u and C. Youker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Threalkill v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00922
Petitioner: Kenneth Threalkill
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jacobs v. County of Rutherford et al
as 3:2022cv00921
Plaintiff: Taylor Jacobs
Defendant: County of Rutherford and (f/n/u) Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Trinity Correctional Food Services et al
as 3:2022cv00920
Plaintiff: Corey Taylor
Defendant: Trinity Correctional Food Services and Metropolitan Government, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConahie v. City of Waverly, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00915
Plaintiff: Tory Alexander McConahie
Defendant: City of Waverly, Tennessee and Humphreys County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?