Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,666
Halstead v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02606
Petitioner:
Michael Halstead
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hickman v. Wardlow
as 2:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Rickey A Hickman
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cradic v. Boyd
as 2:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Cradic
Defendant:
Bert C. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims, Jr. v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00992
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Benson v. Bonner
as 2:2023cv02584
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02576
Petitioner:
Richard L Ross
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bailey v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Earsel Delano Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claxton v. Pounds
as 2:2023cv02553
Petitioner:
Darryl Claxton
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
