US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,120
Lambert v. Wardlow
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
James A Lambert
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02622
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Eller
as 2:2023cv02620
Petitioner:
Chris Brown and Christopher D. Brown
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Shelby Fiduciary Sale Force of Shelby County Jail
as 2:2023cv02621
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
Shelby Fiduciary Sale Force of Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Halstead v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02606
Petitioner:
Michael Halstead
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benson v. Bonner
as 2:2023cv02584
Petitioner:
Rickey Benson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02576
Petitioner:
Richard L Ross
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claxton v. Pounds
as 2:2023cv02553
Petitioner:
Darryl Claxton
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clinton v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02548
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Petitioner:
James Mays, III
Defendant:
Collette Peters
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
