US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,067
Young v. Watwood
as 3:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
KRIS THEOTIS YOUNG
Respondent:
BRANDON WATWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Warren v. Knox County Criminal Court
as 3:2024cv00487
Defendant:
Knox County Criminal Court
Plaintiff:
Kenyan Roshad Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00371
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Jason Lewis Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimsey v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
William Strat Kimsey
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00456
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Lavan Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abernathy v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00352
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Corey Cortez Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thomas v. Spangler et al
as 3:2024cv00427
Respondent:
Tom Spangler and Chief Cox
Petitioner:
Eric Dewayne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Leeds
as 3:2024cv00409
Respondent:
Warden Chance Leeds
Petitioner:
Paul J Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odum v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00335
Respondent:
Tennessee State of
Petitioner:
Nathan Lebron Odum, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padgett v. Eller
as 2:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
Garner Dwight Padgett
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
