US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 26,825
Layne v. Sanders
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Laura Layne
Defendant:
Brenda Marie Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry et al v. Oak Ridge School District Board of Education et al
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Douglas Perry and Zachary Panter
Defendant:
Oak Ridge School District Board of Education and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williams v. USA
as 1:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Donta Devoe Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hickman v. Wardlow
as 2:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Rickey A Hickman
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cradic v. Boyd
as 2:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Cradic
Defendant:
Bert C. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Fraley et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Porter, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Fraley, Matt Patterson, Steve Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hymas v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jay Hymas
Defendant:
United States Department of State and United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salmons v. Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Virgil Salmons
Defendant:
Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
