US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,928
Albarrakee v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Basim Neamah Albarrakee
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hymas v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jay Hymas
Defendant:
United States Department of State and United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Currier v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV2)
as 3:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Timothy Curtis Currier
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hamrick v. City of Gatlinburg, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 3:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Marrissa Hamrick
Defendant:
City of Gatlinburg, Tennessee and Mirian Anarbia Gonzales
Respondent:
U. S. Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Van Over v. AKHLAGHI et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Barry Van Over
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD AKHLAGHI, PAMCHAL SAYYAD, NEXTGEN MMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Thomas v. FACE Amusement Group, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00321
Defendant:
FACE Amusement Group, Inc. and Cynthia Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
