Gillespie v. Matthews
Case Number: 3:2023cv00458
Filed: April 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Knoxville Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees [Doc. 4 ] is GRANTED and Plaintiff is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00; 2. The custodian of Plaintiff's i nmate trust account is DIRECTED to submit the filing fee to the Clerk in the manner set forth above; 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to the custodian of inmate accounts at the institution where Plaintiff i s now confined and to the Courts financial deputy; 4. This action will be DISMISSED as duplicative; and 5. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 4/8/2024. (BJL)*Mailed to Gordon W Gillespie 104482 and to the custodian of inmate accounts. BLOUNT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER 920 E LAMAR ALEXANDER PARKWAY MARYVILLE, TN 37804. *Sent via ad hoc to the Court's Financial Deputy Clerks.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gillespie v. Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?