District of Tennessee Court Cases

Cases filed

Cases 21 - 30 of 51,955
Nesler v. WTDF et al
as 2:2015cv02348
Plaintiff: John J. Nesler
Defendant: WTDF, CCA, USMS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagerty et al v. Gafford et al
as 3:2015cv00584
Plaintiff: Ann Marie Hagerty , Charles W. Hull
Defendant: James C. Gafford, Carol Gafford, LFD Christian Foundation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Ingram v. Guardsmark Security Company
as 2:2015cv02346
Plaintiff: Tamera E. Ingram
Defendant: Guardsmark Security Company
Cause Of Action: Violation of Civil Rights
Sappington v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2015cv02347
Petitioner: William Sappington
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00046
Plaintiff: Latosha Sheree Brown
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitehardt, Inc. v. McKernan et al
as 3:2015cv00583
Plaintiff: Whitehardt, Inc.
Defendant: Gordon J. McKernan, The McKernan Law Firm, PLLC, Gordon McKernan Injury Attorneys, LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Thompson v. First Acceptance Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00586
Plaintiff: Annie Thompson
Defendant: First Acceptance Corporation, First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., First Acceptance Insurance Company of Tennessee, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv02345
Plaintiff: Brandon Michael Johnson
Defendant: Jones, Ivy
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurd v. Holloway
as 1:2015cv01130
Petitioner: James E. Hurd
Respondent: James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02342
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.