District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00598
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Volteon LLC v. Shenzhen Qingcheng Wireless Technology Co Ltd
as 2:2026cv01025
Defendant:
Shenzhen Qingcheng Wireless Technology Co Ltd
Plaintiff:
Volteon LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07189
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Berry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv07191
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tanya Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Thermos et al
as 1:2026cv00508
Defendant:
Andrea Stewart-Cousins, Suzanne Adams, Robert H. Tembeckjian and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Troutman et al
as 1:2026cv00509
Defendant:
Marina Cora Mundy, Cheree Buggs, Jennifer R. Chan and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stratton v. Jasper City Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv00506
Defendant:
Jasper Texas State Trooper Department, Clint Fowler, FNU Coons and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal Lynn Stratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. State Farm Lloyds
as 5:2026cv07181
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Maria I. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Graves v. Name Unknown
as 9:2026cv00995
Defendant:
Name Unknown
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. STATE FARM LLOYDS
as 1:2026cv03162
Defendant:
STATE FARM LLOYDS
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
