Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 103,344
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv01906
Petitioner:
Jonathan Dean Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Washington v. Sheriff, Lubbock County
as 5:2024cv00178
Respondent:
Sheriff, Lubbock County
Petitioner:
Daryl Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. Nursing et al
as 9:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sanchez
Respondent:
Nursing, The Guard of the Coffield Unit, Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier v. McNamara
as 6:2024cv00397
Petitioner:
Christopher Collier
Respondent:
Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Terrance T. Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pacheco v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00672
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jesus Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00255
Respondent:
Cheron Y. Nash
Petitioner:
Jose Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burton v. Ector Co Sheriffs Department et al
as 7:2024cv00172
Defendant:
Ector County Detention Center and Ector Co Sheriffs Department
Plaintiff:
Amy Nicole Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Quintana et al
as 7:2024cv00173
Defendant:
Midland County Detention Center, Cpl. FNU Alcatraz, Officer B. Quintana and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Jesus Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
