US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 69,990
Bryant v. Ion Solar, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Grace Bryant
Defendant:
Ion Developer, LLC, Dividend Solar Finance, LLC and Ion Solar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gonzalez v. Jay Management Company LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00301
Defendant:
Robert Hilton Adams, Liberty County TX, Jay Management Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Miriam Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Morrison v. TDCJ
as 2:2024cv00595
Petitioner:
Corey Brandon Morrison
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Beckett et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Traci Beckett and Kay Parte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Davidson
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Rutherford Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brockman v. Addison et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James Brockman
Defendant:
Jeff M Addison, Deborah Moore, Troy Hornsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 6:2024cv00268
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PFANNENSTIEL v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
as 4:2024cv00678
Defendant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
DUANE PFANNENSTIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wilt v. Defense Finance and Accounting Service
as 6:2024cv00266
Defendant:
Defense Finance and Accounting Service
Plaintiff:
Miranda Wilt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
